Spouses & Social Security

Your strategy with your spouse can have enormous consequences 

Video

SPOUSAL BENEFITS

Survivor Benefits

HOW THEY WORK

The larger of the two benefits will be the payment the surviving spouse keeps if Matt or Jill died. The inverse is often erroneously ignored.

You should realize that the smaller of the two benefits disappears in the event of either spouse’s passing.

Let’s assume Jill had wonderful health and a family history of longevity and yet Matt had the opposite. Jill might determine she should wait on filing for Social Security given that she has read that if you live beyond low to mid 80s, you are better off waiting.

Now assume Matt, who had poor health, passes away in his 70s. Jill will take Matt’s benefit as a survivor and her benefit was mostly wasted. She may have only received a few years’ worth of it.

Video

SURVIVOR BENEFITS

Longevity & Breakeven Analysis

HOW IT WORKS

A breakeven analysis is when you determine the exact age at which two different strategies are equal.

If a spouse has good family health history, you should consider maximizing the survivor benefit for that spouse. This means delaying the larger of the two benefits.

Notice the difference between Strategy 1 and Strategy 2 below.

Strategy 1 pays $1,500 less – as a couple – in monthly payments for the first 4 years.

Strategy 2 pays $700 more forever after 2023.

At what point does Strategy 2 catch up? 
The Breakeven is 2031, when Matt is 78 and Jill is 77.

The Cost of Spending Your Own Money

AND WHAT IT MEANS

Most people fail to factor that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar in 15 years.

Intuitively that effect of inflation makes sense, but how should you consider inflation in your breakeven analysis?

First, Matt and Jill should assume some rate of increases on Social Security. Since 2008, the average has been 1.79%. Since 1985, the average has been 2.58%. https://www.ssa.gov/news/cola/

Consider using something conservative like 1.5%.

The more common mistake is comparing the 8% growth of Social Security with the modest rate of return one might see in their retirement accounts.

If you are retired, yet you choose to delay your Social Security to 70, you are likely withdrawing from your retirement accounts. Those withdrawals could have been avoided had you filed for Social Security earlier. That money could have earned some interest in your retirement account.

If you assume a rate of return on that money, you need to realize that Strategy 2 takes longer to make up the retirement account growth not experienced in addition to the Social Security money not received.

Matt and Jill need to live to 82 and 81 respectively if they can earn 5% in their portfolio to break even after both effects. You can see how your risk tolerance and growth rates will affect your true breakeven.

Other Spousal Considerations

KEEP THESE IN MIND

If you have been married to someone for more than 10 years and that spouse has passed away, you may be eligible for survivor benefits as well.

I met Susan who had been married three times. She divorced George decades ago, Roger passed away, and she is currently married to Doyle. She has the option to take a survivor benefit using Roger’s earnings record starting at 60, a spousal benefit from Doyle starting between 62 and 70, or her own benefit starting between 62 and 70.

If she elects a spousal or her own benefit before her FRA, she will be locked in to that amount forever.

Here is what we plan to do:
• She will file for Roger’s survivor benefit at 60.
• If Doyle’s spousal benefit exceeds Roger’s survivor benefit at 66 (her FRA) we will switch to a spousal. 
• Finally, at 70 she will get 132% of her own FRA.

Couples Social Security is a team sport. 

Coordinate your benefits carefully.